Italy’s Antitrust Authority wielded its regulatory power, slapping a hefty fine of 10 million euros on retail giant Amazon. The penalty was imposed for what the authority deemed as unfair trade practices, specifically targeting the eCommerce behemoth’s automatic enrollment of customers into recurring purchase options.
At the heart of the matter lies the pre-set “recurring purchase” option, strategically placed for a broad spectrum of products on the www.amazon.it website. This default setting, as highlighted by the Antitrust Authority, not only applies to items directly sold by Amazon but also extends to third-party sellers operating through the platform.
In its official statement, the authority elucidated that the automatic ticking of the recurring purchase icon serves as a subtle nudging mechanism, coaxing consumers into periodic purchases, even when such acquisitions might be unnecessary. This practice, the authority argued, severely curtails consumer choice, tipping the scales in favor of repetitive transactions driven more by convenience than genuine need.
Moreover, the Antitrust Authority condemned Amazon’s conduct as falling short of the expected standards of professional diligence. As a prominent player in the eCommerce landscape, Amazon is obligated, the authority contended, to design online purchasing interfaces that empower consumers to make informed and uncoerced commercial decisions. The automatic opt-in to recurring purchases, it concluded, starkly contradicts this principle.
In a noteworthy revelation, the Antitrust Authority divulged that the fine was directed at two entities within the Amazon conglomerate. Both the Luxembourg-based Amazon Services Europe and Amazon EU found themselves in the regulatory crosshairs, facing the financial repercussions of their alleged transgressions.
Source: Ansa Brasil
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh