Spotify, the popular audio streaming service, announced on Thursday that Apple had rejected its latest version of the iOS app due to the inclusion of pricing information within the app, a move that Spotify claims is necessary to comply with European Commission regulations.
According to a report from Reuters, Spotify, headquartered in Sweden, submitted a revised version of its app to Apple featuring basic pricing details and website links — an action mandated by the European Commission’s ruling in a recent music streaming case. However, Apple, based in Cupertino, California, rebuffed the update, directly informing Spotify of the rejection.
A spokesperson for Spotify expressed frustration, accusing Apple of flouting the European Commission’s directives and prioritizing profit over compliance with the law. “Apple has once again defied the European Commission’s decision, rejecting our update for attempting to communicate with customers about our prices unless we pay Apple a new tax,” the spokesperson stated.
Related: EU Scrutinizes Apple’s Compliance with Antitrust Order, Spotify Awaits Resolution
This latest clash follows a significant antitrust penalty levied against Apple by the European Commission in March, amounting to 1.84 billion euros ($1.97 billion). The penalty was imposed due to allegations that Apple had hindered competition from music streaming rivals through App Store restrictions, with Spotify’s 2019 complaint serving as a catalyst for the investigation, as reported by Reuters.
In response to regulatory pressure, Apple had recently announced measures aimed at allowing music streaming apps within the European Economic Area to inform users about alternative payment methods. However, Spotify’s submission to Apple did not include the proposed in-app link to external payment options.
The rejection of Spotify’s updated app underscores the ongoing tension between Apple and app developers over App Store policies and fees. While Apple’s proposal offers a pathway for compliance with EU mandates, Spotify’s refusal to include in-app links signals a continued standoff between the two tech giants.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand