The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched a campaign against what it calls “junk” patent listings in the pharmaceutical industry, aiming to pave the way for more affordable generic alternatives to brand-name drugs, including popular medications like Ozempic and Victoza.
The move comes as the FTC intensifies its efforts to combat tactics employed by drug manufacturers to delay generic competition, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.
Central to the issue is the Orange Book, a publication by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that catalogues patents relevant to brand-name pharmaceuticals. According to a law designed to promote generics, successful challenges to listed patents can grant generic manufacturers a period of exclusivity. However, if a brand-name manufacturer chooses to litigate a challenge to an Orange Book patent, it triggers a 30-month delay in generic approval.
The FTC alleges that pharmaceutical companies excessively list patents in the Orange Book, leading to unnecessary delays in the approval of generic alternatives and artificially inflating drug prices. FTC Chair Lina Khan emphasized the impact of these practices on consumers, stating, “By filing bogus patent listings, pharma companies block competition and inflate the cost of prescription drugs, forcing Americans to pay sky-high prices for medicines they rely on.” According to the FDA, the introduction of just one generic competitor for a brand-name drug can reduce prices by approximately 40%.
In a recent move, the FTC issued warnings to 10 companies, notifying them that their patent listings were invalid. Additionally, the agency informed the FDA of its objections to the patent listings. The targeted companies, which include AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Covis Pharma, GSK, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals and some of their subsidiaries, were identified for what the FTC described as “junk listings” on patents for 20 drug products, including the diabetes drug Ozempic, as well as inhalers and other diabetes treatments.
Source: WSJ
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand