Exxon Mobil’s $60 billion acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources has received the green light from the FTC, allowing the deal to move forward. However, former Pioneer CEO Scott Sheffield has been barred from Exxon’s board amidst allegations of attempting to collude with OPEC to manipulate oil prices.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleged that Sheffield coordinated with U.S. shale oil producers to restrict output and inflate energy prices. According to Reuters, the FTC claimed Sheffield utilized his position to align oil production across the Permian Basin with OPEC+.
Despite the controversy surrounding Sheffield, the approval of the acquisition allows Exxon to finalize the deal on Friday, enabling the company to shift its focus to a dispute with Chevron over its proposed acquisition of Hess Corp. Exxon’s shares saw a 1% increase in morning trading, reaching $117.26.
Related: FTC to Approve Exxon’s $64 Billion Deal with Pioneer Resources
Kyle Mach, Deputy Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition, emphasized the inappropriateness of Sheffield’s past conduct for a position on Exxon’s board. However, when questioned about potential criminal implications, the FTC refrained from commenting, stating their obligation to refer such matters to the U.S. Department of Justice.
The approval of Exxon’s acquisition sets a positive precedent for other energy merger reviews, including those involving Chevron, Diamondback Energy, Occidental Petroleum, and Chesapeake Energy, all of which have faced scrutiny from the FTC.
Pioneer expressed surprise at the FTC’s complaint against Sheffield but affirmed its commitment to the deal’s closure. The company argued that Sheffield’s industry commentary, although outspoken, should not disqualify him from a board seat, citing its relevance to public interest.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh