French luxury fashion house Hermès is hitting back against a lawsuit filed in the United States, dismissing the claims as “far-fetched” and arguing that they fail to demonstrate any violation of antitrust laws.
According to Reuters, Hermes made its case in a filing on Thursday in San Francisco federal court, challenging allegations that it unfairly requires customers to make substantial purchases before offering them the chance to buy one of its highly coveted Birkin handbags.
The lawsuit, filed in March as a proposed class-action, accuses Hermès of creating an unlawful tie between the sale of Birkin bags and the purchase of other luxury items such as jewelry and shoes. Plaintiffs allege that the company only grants access to Birkin bags to customers with a “sufficient purchase history,” effectively forcing consumers into spending thousands of dollars before being eligible to acquire the iconic handbags, known for their craftsmanship and prestige.
However, Hermès countered these claims by asserting that even customers without an extensive purchase history still have the opportunity to purchase a Birkin. The luxury brand argued that such requirements do not constitute illegality under antitrust laws and emphasized its commitment to offering superior products.
Read more: Hermès Faces Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Birkin Bag Sales Scheme
“The antitrust laws do not punish companies for creating better, more desirable products than anyone else,” Hermès stated in its filing, as reported by Reuters.
Hermès, along with its legal representatives at Latham & Watkins, declined to provide immediate comments in response to requests for clarification. Similarly, attorneys representing the plaintiffs, based in California, did not respond immediately to requests for comment.
The lawsuit highlights the exclusivity surrounding Birkin bags, which are not available for purchase online through Hermès’ website and are reportedly not openly displayed for sale in the company’s retail stores. Instead, the complaint alleges that sales associates encourage customers to buy additional items to enhance their chances of acquiring a Birkin.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand