In a ruling on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez of Los Angeles delivered a blow to plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit challenging National Football League (NFL) restrictions on televised games. The judge granted the NFL’s motion to block a trial subpoena aimed at compelling Hans Schroeder, the league’s Executive Vice President of Media Distribution, to testify live at the upcoming trial.
The lawsuit, set to commence on June 5, alleges collusion between the NFL and its member teams, along with television broadcast partners, to tightly control game distribution. Plaintiffs argue that this control has artificially inflated the price of the Sunday Ticket package, a subscription service allowing viewers to watch out-of-market NFL games. Both residential and commercial subscribers, including bars, hotels, and restaurants, seek damages amounting to billions of dollars for what they perceive as overcharges.
Read more: NFL’s Exclusive Streaming of Playoff Game Raises Antitrust Concerns
However, Gutierrez’s recent rulings have shaped the trajectory of the upcoming trial, determining which evidence will be admissible. The NFL’s successful bid to prevent Schroeder from testifying live, citing his residence in New York and prior deposition, marks a strategic victory for the league. Nonetheless, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and Brian Rolapp, Schroeder’s supervisor who oversees Sunday Ticket, are expected to provide in-person testimony.
The NFL has vehemently denied the allegations, asserting that its distribution practices are fair and designed to uphold the quality of the product. Notably, the defendants in this case are exclusively the NFL and its member teams; neither DirecTV nor YouTube TV, the current carrier of Sunday Ticket, are implicated.
Despite the setback in compelling live testimony from Schroeder, the plaintiffs retain the option to present a videotaped deposition of the executive.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand