The U.S. Department of Justice has taken a significant step towards increasing the mobility of college athletes. On Thursday, a proposed consent decree was filed in a West Virginia federal court aiming to prohibit the NCAA from enforcing its controversial rule that requires student-athletes who have transferred once to sit out a year if they transfer again.
The decree, which is awaiting approval by U.S. District Judge John Preston Bailey of the Northern District of West Virginia, also mandates that the NCAA grant an additional year of eligibility to certain athletes who were previously ineligible due to the transfer rule. This provision is designed to compensate those affected by the rule for a season or any portion of a season they were unable to participate in.
“Free from anticompetitive rules that unfairly limit their mobility, Division I college athletes will now be able to choose the institutions that best meet their academic, personal, and professional development needs,” said Jonathan Kanter, Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “This resolution is a testament to the benefits of federal and state enforcers working together to ensure free markets and fair competition for all Americans.”
Read more: NCAA and SEC Approve Historic $2.8 Billion Settlement in Antitrust Cases
Judge Bailey had earlier granted a preliminary injunction in the case, which prevented the NCAA from enforcing the transfer rule during the spring sports season. The formal agreement, once approved, will solidify this change and mark a notable shift in how the NCAA regulates student-athlete transfers.
Virginia, one of the ten states that joined the Justice Department in the lawsuit, has been a vocal critic of the NCAA’s policies. Attorney General Jason Miyares, who has actively challenged the NCAA’s regulations in recent years, praised the proposed decree as a victory for student-athletes.
“The NCAA’s inconsistent and arbitrary enforcement of its transfer eligibility rule served as an illegal restraint on student-athletes’ ability to market their talent and control their education,” Miyares stated. “I’m pleased that we could reach an agreement with the NCAA over its transfer eligibility rule. This agreement not only enhances the rights of student-athletes but also provides new opportunities for them to reach their full potential – both on and off the court.”
Source: Justice Gov
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand