American Airlines Seeks New Arrangement with JetBlue Pending Court Ruling Reversal
American Airlines has expressed willingness to consider a new arrangement with JetBlue Airways, contingent upon a favorable ruling from an appeals court. This comes after a May 2023 decision by U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin mandated the dissolution of the airlines’ “Northeast Alliance” (NEA), which had permitted the two carriers to coordinate flights and share revenue.
Judge Sorokin’s ruling determined that the NEA violated antitrust laws, preventing American and JetBlue from engaging in any agreement involving revenue sharing or coordination of routes and capacity for the next decade. American Airlines’ lawyer, Greg Garre, emphasized the restrictive nature of the ruling, noting that it prohibits the airline from forming any similar arrangements and grants the district court ongoing jurisdiction over the matter for at least ten years.
During Monday’s hearing at the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Garre confirmed that American Airlines is interested in exploring further collaboration with JetBlue. “We would seriously consider that, yes, and the injunction prevents us from doing that — any sort of similar arrangement,” Garre responded when asked by the court.
Read more: DOJ Expected To File Antitrust Suit Against JetBlue-Spirit Merger: Bloomberg
The Justice Department, represented by lawyer Daniel Haar, argued that the NEA had eliminated price competition between American and JetBlue, which had previously benefited consumers. Haar stated, “Before the NEA was established this competition was directly benefiting consumers.”
The NEA, which involved cooperation on flights in and out of New York City and Boston, was initially intended to enhance scheduling efficiency and revenue sharing between American, the nation’s largest airline, and JetBlue, the sixth largest.
JetBlue has opted not to appeal the ruling, focusing instead on its efforts to gain approval for its now-abandoned $3.8 billion acquisition of Spirit Airlines. The airline did not provide immediate comment on Monday.
In its legal briefs, American Airlines argued that Judge Sorokin’s decision invalidating the NEA could have broader implications, potentially threatening other beneficial collaborations between competitors. The airline’s lawyers contended that the ruling could discourage “fruitful and lawful collaboration that benefits consumers through increased output, decreased prices, and improved product quality.”
Source: Kdal610
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand