Discover Financial Services’ Pulse Network Settles Antitrust Lawsuit Against Visa
Pulse Network, a unit of Discover Financial Services, has agreed to settle a long-standing antitrust lawsuit against Visa. The settlement, disclosed in a court filing on Friday in a federal court in Houston, Texas, marks the conclusion of a legal battle that began in 2014.
According to Reuters, Pulse Network had accused Visa of obstructing competition in the lucrative debit card network services market, leading to higher fees for merchants. The lawsuit alleged that Visa’s pricing structure, which included monthly and per-transaction fees, unfairly dissuaded merchants from switching to other card networks, thereby stifling competition.
The terms of the settlement remain undisclosed as the court filing, signed by both parties, did not provide specifics. Both Pulse and Visa have not responded to requests for comments or additional information regarding the settlement.
Pulse’s lawsuit sought compensation for lost profits and demanded a court order to foster healthy competition within the debit card network services industry. A trial was originally scheduled for 2026. Visa had consistently denied any wrongdoing throughout the litigation.
Read more: Chile’s Competition Tribunal Orders Visa & Mastercard To Alter Payment Practices
The case had experienced several legal twists and turns over the years. In 2018, U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes dismissed the lawsuit, but the decision was overturned by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2022. The appellate court reassigned the case to a new judge, citing concerns that Judge Hughes may have exhibited “ingrained skepticism about Pulse’s claims.”
With the lawsuit now dismissed “with prejudice,” meaning it cannot be refiled, the resolution marks the end of a protracted legal struggle between the two financial giants. The settlement’s impact on the debit card network services market and its participants remains to be seen, as details of the agreement have yet to be made public.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand