Italian competition regulators have levied a $6.4 million fine on DR Automobiles, a domestic car manufacturer, for allegedly marketing vehicles assembled from Chinese parts as “Made in Italy.” According to BBC News, the automaker is accused of misleading consumers who prefer to support locally produced goods, as the company primarily assembles vehicles using components from Chinese makers including Chery, BAIC, and JAC.
DR Automobiles plans to appeal the fine, arguing that it never claimed its vehicles were entirely made in Italy. The company maintains that it assembles affordable vehicles using pre-made parts.
The regulator’s findings indicate that vehicles under DR’s DR and EVO brands were marketed as Italian-made despite being largely composed of Chinese parts, with only minor assembly and finishing work conducted in Italy. This suggests that the vehicles were sold as completely built-up unit (CBU) kits rather than being genuinely manufactured in Italy.
In a statement, the regulator noted: “This practice has coincided with a period in which the company recorded marked growth in sales of DR and EVO vehicles in the Italian market.”
This incident follows a recent seizure of 134 Morocco-made Fiat Topolinos at the Italian port of Livorno due to their display of Italian-flag insignia. Parent company Stellantis stated it adhered to regulations but opted to remove the flags. Additionally, earlier this year, Stellantis was compelled to rename its Alfa Romeo Milano battery-electric vehicle to Junior after authorities highlighted that the cars were produced in Stellantis’s Polish plant.
The fine on DR Automobiles underscores the scrutiny Italian regulators are placing on the authenticity of “Made in Italy” claims, ensuring consumers are not misled about the origin of the products they purchase.
Source: BBC News
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand