Pharmaceutical giant Bristol Myers Squibb has agreed to pay 10 million shekels ($2.7 million) to settle a potential antitrust case in Israel. This settlement pertains to allegations that the company obstructed the creation of a generic version of its anti-cancer drug, Imnovid. The Israel Competition Authority announced this decision on Monday.
The anti-cancer drug Imnovid, distributed in Israel by Neopharm Scientific, is vital for treating multiple myeloma and AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma. The controversy began when Bristol Myers Squibb and Neopharm Scientific declined a request from KS Kim International for samples needed to develop a generic version of the drug. Although the samples were eventually provided after a five-month delay, the Israel Competition Authority contended that this postponement hindered competition for a crucial medication.
Jonathan Cwikel, deputy legal counsel for civil and administrative affairs at the Israel Competition Authority, emphasized the broader message this settlement sends. “We want to send a message to companies that have a dominant position in the market that they cannot act in a manner that is likely to reduce competition,” Cwikel told Reuters.
The Israel Competition Authority initially planned to fine Neopharm 64 million shekels and an unnamed company executive 600,000 shekels. However, before a similar action could be taken against Bristol Myers Squibb, the company proposed a settlement, as explained by Cwikel.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand