Federal regulators have made a decision to ban the digital platform NGL from serving users under the age of 18, accusing the app of misleading claims about its ability to combat cyberbullying. The settlement, reported by the Washington Post, marks the first time such a prohibition has been imposed on a digital platform by federal authorities.
NGL, an app widely used by children and teens, aggressively marketed its services to young users despite the inherent risks of bullying associated with its anonymous messaging feature. According to a complaint filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office, the app’s executives ignored user concerns about these risks, dismissing them as “suckers” and continuing their “bait-and-switch” tactics.
The complaint detailed how NGL tricked users into subscribing by sending them computer-generated messages that appeared to be from real people. These messages enticed users to pay up to $9.99 a week for a service that purported to reveal the real identities behind the messages. However, those who subscribed received only vague “hints,” often of dubious authenticity. The FTC and the District Attorney’s Office also charged that NGL violated children’s privacy laws by collecting data from users under 13 without parental consent.
In response to these allegations, NGL agreed to a $5 million settlement and to cease marketing to children and teens. This action represents a significant step in the federal government’s efforts to address the potential harm tech platforms pose to young users and to hold companies accountable for exploiting minors for profit.
FTC Chair Lina Khan, who has intensified scrutiny of the tech industry since her appointment in 2021, emphasized the importance of protecting children from unethical business practices. “We will keep cracking down on businesses that unlawfully exploit kids for profit,” Khan stated in an announcement.
Source: Washington Post
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand