The French competition authority has confirmed an ongoing investigation into Nvidia, the leading global chipmaker, over alleged anti-competitive practices. Benoit Coeure, president of the French competition authority, announced on Monday during a press briefing that the company could face charges if the investigation yields substantial evidence.
This announcement follows a report from Reuters earlier this month, which, citing anonymous sources, indicated that Nvidia was likely to be charged by the French antitrust regulator. Nvidia, renowned for its chips utilized in artificial intelligence (AI) and computer graphics, has experienced a surge in demand since the launch of the generative AI application ChatGPT. This surge has prompted regulatory scrutiny in both Europe and the United States.
In a regulatory filing last year, Nvidia disclosed that regulators from the European Union, China and France had requested information regarding its graphic cards. The French watchdog, in a report issued last month concerning competition in the generative AI sector, highlighted the potential for abuse by chip providers. The report expressed particular concern about the industry’s reliance on Nvidia’s CUDA chip programming software, the sole system fully compatible with the GPUs essential for accelerated computing.
Furthermore, the French competition authority expressed unease about Nvidia’s recent investments in AI-focused cloud service providers such as CoreWeave. These investments have raised questions about potential market dominance and the fairness of competition within the rapidly expanding AI industry.
The outcome of this investigation could have significant implications for Nvidia and the broader tech industry, particularly in the burgeoning field of AI. As regulatory bodies on both sides of the Atlantic continue to scrutinize the practices of major tech companies, the findings of the French competition authority will be closely watched.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand