The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has initiated an investigation into Macquarie Asset Management’s intended acquisition of a substantial interest in Last Mile Infrastructure (Holdings) Limited. This move comes amid concerns about potential impacts on competition within the UK energy market and the regulatory functions of Ofgem.
The CMA’s probe aims to ascertain whether the transaction could diminish competition or affect Ofgem’s capacity to evaluate energy network operators effectively. The regulatory body highlighted the possibility that the acquisition might create a “relevant merger situation” under the Enterprise Act 2002, particularly involving an energy network merger. If such a situation arises, it could significantly hinder Ofgem’s ability to conduct comparative analyses of energy network enterprises.
Related: UK Watchdog Appoints Three Senior Directors for New Digital Markets Regime
In a statement, the CMA elaborated, “The CMA is also considering whether it is or may be the case that this transaction, if carried into effect, will result in the creation of a relevant merger situation involving an energy network merger under the merger provisions of the Enterprise Act 2002 and, if so, whether the creation of that situation may be expected to cause substantial prejudice to the ability of Ofgem to make comparisons between energy network enterprises of the type involved in the energy network merger.”
To ensure a comprehensive review, the CMA has invited public comments on the proposed acquisition. Stakeholders and interested parties have until 2nd August 2024 to submit their views.
The outcome of this investigation could have significant implications for the structure of the UK’s energy market and the oversight capabilities of Ofgem, the regulator tasked with protecting consumer interests and ensuring fair competition. The CMA’s findings will determine whether the merger will proceed and under what conditions, if any.
Source: Energy Live News
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand