Grab, Southeast Asia’s largest ride-hailing and food delivery company, has canceled its planned acquisition of Trans-cab, Singapore’s third-largest taxi operator. This decision comes in the wake of concerns raised by Singapore’s competition watchdog, the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore (CCCS).
In a statement released on Thursday evening, CCCS confirmed that both Grab and Trans-cab had notified the commission on July 22 about their decision to halt the acquisition. “With the termination of the proposed acquisition, the parties have withdrawn their application to CCCS for a decision, and CCCS has accordingly ended its assessment of the proposed acquisition,” the CCCS statement read.
The move to end the acquisition process follows initial concerns raised by CCCS in October 2023 regarding the potential impact of the deal on market competition. Earlier this month, the commission had requested Grab and Trans-cab to propose solutions to address these antitrust issues.
The proposed acquisition, valued at approximately S$100 million (US$74.55 million), would have further consolidated Grab’s position in Singapore’s competitive ride-hailing market. Grab, already one of the top ride-hailing firms in the city-state, faced significant regulatory scrutiny over the potential reduction in competition the deal might have caused.
Yee Wee Tang, managing director at Grab Singapore, reiterated the company’s commitment to providing affordable and reliable transportation options. “The ruling does not change our determination to do everything that we can to offer affordable, reliable transport options to passengers in Singapore,” Yee stated in a statement to Reuters.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand