A Paramount Global investor has filed a lawsuit to halt the media giant’s impending merger with Skydance Media, alleging the deal would inflict a $1.65 billion loss on shareholders. The lawsuit, submitted by Scott Baker in Delaware’s Chancery Court on Wednesday, challenges the fairness of the merger, claiming it disproportionately benefits media mogul Shari Redstone and her controlling entity, National Amusements Inc (NAI).
According to Reuters, Skydance Media, led by David Ellison, secured the deal to acquire Paramount earlier in July, culminating months of speculation regarding the future of the storied Hollywood studio. The lawsuit asserts that the Skydance merger’s primary objective is to allow Redstone to liquidate her investment in Paramount at a significant premium, to the detriment of other stockholders.
“That payout is only worth $12.23 per Paramount Class B share. Thus, when the merger closes, the non-NAI Class B shareholders will suffer $1.65 billion in damages,” the lawsuit states. Baker contends that this arrangement is unjust, as it offers a substantial payout to Redstone while leaving other Class B shareholders with considerably less.
Read more: Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount Global Face Mounting Concerns Over Proposed Merger
The complaint echoes past investor grievances, notably referencing the controversial CBS-Viacom merger in 2019, which resulted in the formation of Paramount Global. That deal also faced legal challenges from investors who accused Redstone of unduly influencing CBS into an inequitable merger.
The current lawsuit underscores the discontent among Paramount’s Class B stockholders, who feel sidelined by a deal they perceive as skewed in favor of Redstone and NAI. The merger has been marked by significant executive turnover and competitive bids, suggesting turbulent negotiations behind the scenes.
As the lawsuit progresses, it may spur additional legal actions from other investors seeking to challenge the merger. The outcome could have significant implications for Paramount Global and its stakeholders, potentially reshaping the landscape of Hollywood’s corporate structure.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand