California Supreme Court Upholds Proposition 22, Securing Independent Contractor Status for Uber and Lyft Drivers
In a significant win for the ride-hailing industry, the California Supreme Court on Thursday upheld Proposition 22, a measure approved by voters allowing app-based services such as Uber and Lyft to classify drivers as independent contractors rather than employees entitled to greater benefits.
According to Reuters, the ruling comes as a relief to the ride-hailing giants, which had warned that reclassifying drivers as employees would force them to end or severely limit their services in California. The court dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and four drivers, who argued that the 2020 ballot measure was unconstitutional.
Proposition 22, passed by nearly 60% of California voters in November 2020, maintains drivers’ status as independent contractors but grants them certain benefits. Under the measure, drivers must be paid at least 120% of the minimum wage while transporting passengers and receive reimbursements for expenses and subsidies for health insurance.
Related: Uber Executive Says European Taxis Joining Platform
The distinction between employees and independent contractors is critical for the gig economy. Employees are entitled to minimum wage, overtime pay, expense reimbursements and other protections not extended to independent contractors, who can cost companies up to 30% less, according to various studies.
Uber, Lyft, and other app-based services spent over $200 million on a campaign to pass Prop 22, emphasizing that it allows drivers to earn money while enjoying the flexibility of part-time gig work. The companies argued that many drivers prefer the autonomy of being independent contractors, which enables them to set their own schedules.
The court’s decision solidifies a major victory for the ride-hailing industry, allowing it to continue its operations under the current model without the financial burden of reclassifying thousands of drivers as employees.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Prestigious Universities Accused of Price-Fixing in Financial Aid Scheme
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Honda and Nissan Reportedly Exploring Merger
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
EU Regulator Fines Meta €251 Million Over 2018 Facebook Data Breach
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
US Antitrust Chief Jonathan Kanter to Step Down After Pivotal Three-Year Tenure
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
Sandoz Settles Price-Fixing Allegations with $275 Million Agreement
Dec 17, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Remedies After Illumina/GRAIL– The Thorny Question of Proportionality
Dec 17, 2024 by
Aleksander Tombinski & Ciara Denihan
Why Was Illumina/GRAIL Blocked in the EU? Reviewing The European Commission’s Assessment of Vertical Mergers in Light of the 2022 Prohibition Decision
Dec 17, 2024 by
Will Sparks
The Role of Uncertainty in the Future European Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons Learned From Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Svend Albaek & Daniel Donath
Illumina’s Light on Article 22 EUMR: The Suspended Step and Uncertain Future of EU Merger Control Over Below-Threshold “Killer” Mergers
Dec 17, 2024 by
Anna Tzanaki
EU-Level Jurisdiction Over “Killer Acquisitions” in the Aftermath of Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Peter Whelan