Alaska Air Extends Review for $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Deal Amid Antitrust Concerns
Alaska Air Group has agreed to extend the review period for its proposed $1.9 billion acquisition of Hawaiian Airlines. This decision comes amid ongoing antitrust scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The extension was confirmed in a filing by Alaska Air Group on Tuesday.
“Our airlines have mutually agreed with the DOJ on a brief extension of the formal review period until August 15,” the company stated.
The acquisition, which was announced last year, has been under intense antitrust review. Both Alaska Air and Hawaiian Airlines disclosed in March that they have been cooperating with the DOJ throughout the review process and intend to continue this cooperative approach.
Related: Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines Enter Timing Agreement with DOJ
The U.S. airline industry has been facing shortages of new planes, jet engines and pilots, prompting companies to seek growth through acquisitions. This strategy, however, has drawn the attention of antitrust regulators who are generally cautious about mergers between smaller airlines.
The proposed acquisition would significantly boost Alaska Air’s market presence, giving it control of over 50% of the market for flights to Hawaii, a highly sought-after holiday destination. This market dominance is a key point of concern for antitrust regulators.
In March, the airlines entered a timing agreement with the DOJ, committing not to finalize the deal within 90 days after providing antitrust-related information. The extension until August 15 allows additional time for the DOJ to review the details of the acquisition.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand