Hungary’s competition watchdog has imposed a substantial fine of 770,000 euros ($839,916) on Wizz Air, citing misleading communication practices. According to Reuters, the authority announced the penalty on its website on Saturday.
The Hungarian competition authority accused the budget airline of breaching professional due diligence. Per Reuters, Wizz Air was found to have misled consumers regarding its automatic check-in service, thereby nudging them towards more expensive travel packages. This development comes on the heels of Wizz Air’s announcement earlier this week that it had reduced its annual profit forecast, following a 44% drop in its first-quarter operating profit. The decline was attributed partly to engine troubles with Pratt & Whitney (RTX.N) and the need for one-off wet leases to maintain capacity.
The airline, known for its all-Airbus fleet, has been grappling with significant operational challenges. According to the report, Wizz Air is facing issues with Pratt & Whitney RTX engines, necessitating the grounding of 46 aircraft for inspections this summer. This has further strained the company’s capacity during a period already marked by high costs and a normalization of post-pandemic travel demand.
The European aviation sector has had a turbulent first half of the year, with rising costs and stabilizing demand affecting major carriers. Companies such as Air France-KLM, Lufthansa, and Ryanair have all reported difficulties in their second-quarter earnings. Despite these hurdles, Wizz Air managed to transport 5.9 million passengers in July, achieving a load factor of 93.8%. However, the airline was forced to cancel 1% of its scheduled flights due to global outages.
The financial penalty from Hungary’s competition authority highlights the growing scrutiny on airline practices amid a competitive and cost-sensitive market.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand