India’s Commerce Minister, Piyush Goyal, has raised concerns over the business practices of Amazon and other eCommerce giants, accusing them of engaging in predatory pricing that threatens millions of traditional brick-and-mortar stores across the country. According to Reuters, Goyal singled out Amazon’s strategies, suggesting that the company’s significant investments in India have often been used to offset business losses rather than contribute to the country’s economic growth.
Amazon, along with Walmart-owned Flipkart, has dramatically transformed India’s retail sector in recent years. Both companies have poured billions of dollars into expanding their operations and enticing customers with attractive discounts. However, Indian regulations prohibit these e-commerce platforms from directly selling products to consumers. Instead, they are only allowed to function as marketplaces for third-party sellers. Despite this, small retailers frequently allege that these regulations are sidestepped through complex business structures, allowing the e-commerce giants to maintain a dominant market position.
During an event in New Delhi, Goyal expressed skepticism about Amazon’s pricing and financial practices, questioning the true purpose of its investments. “When Amazon says we are going to invest a billion dollars in India and we all celebrate, we forget the underlying story that the billion dollars is not coming in for any great service,” Goyal remarked. Per Reuters, he hinted that these investments might be covering up predatory pricing tactics, as Amazon’s losses suggest that the company is not operating within the regulatory framework that forbids direct sales to consumers.
Read more: US Lobby Group Urges India to Reconsider Proposed EU-Like Competition Law
Amazon has announced plans to increase its investment in India to $26 billion by 2030, including investments in its cloud services. The company also aims to boost merchandise exports from India to $20 billion by 2025. Despite these ambitious goals, Goyal’s recent remarks reflect his ongoing criticism of U.S.-based e-commerce companies. In 2021, he accused these firms of exploiting their scale and access to vast amounts of low-cost capital to the detriment of small, family-run stores, accusing them of blatantly violating Indian laws.
A special report by Reuters in 2021 revealed that Amazon’s internal documents indicated the company had favored a small group of sellers on its Indian platform, offering them discounted fees and using them to circumvent foreign investment regulations. Amazon, at the time, asserted its compliance with local laws and denied providing preferential treatment to any seller. However, following these revelations, it was announced that two of Amazon’s major sellers involved in the allegations would cease operations on the platform.
Goyal’s comments underscore his concerns over the practices of e-commerce companies in India. “They create entities … when they get caught, they start closing down those entities,” Goyal stated, highlighting the challenges of enforcing regulations in the rapidly evolving digital marketplace.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand