India’s Zee Entertainment and Sony Settle Dispute Over Failed $10 Billion Merger
India’s Zee Entertainment Enterprises and the Indian unit of Sony have reached an agreement to withdraw all claims against each other related to their abandoned $10 billion merger, according to a statement from Zee on Tuesday. This resolution marks the end of a protracted legal battle that followed the collapse of the merger earlier this year.
The merger, initially announced with much anticipation, was called off in January. According to Reuters, the deal fell through in part because Zee was unable to meet certain financial conditions required for the merger. Following the collapse, Zee sought to enforce the merger through India’s National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) but later decided to “aggressively pursue” its claims against Sony through arbitration at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC).
Also Read: India’s Antitrust Body Raises Concerns Over $8.5 Billion Reliance-Disney Merger
However, as per Zee’s latest statement, both companies have now agreed to withdraw all claims from both the SIAC and the NCLT. The company further clarified that the settlement is non-cash based, with neither party bearing any ongoing obligations or liabilities towards the other.
The announcement had an immediate impact on Zee’s stock, which surged by 13% on Tuesday. Despite this uptick, the company’s shares remain down by approximately 35% since the merger was terminated in January.
Analysts have reacted positively to the news. “This is a much-needed respite for Zee,” commented Karan Taurani, an analyst at Elara. The conclusion of the litigation removes a significant burden from the company, according to Shriram Subramanian, founder of InGovern Research Services, a proxy advisory firm. With the legal dispute resolved, Zee’s management can now focus on pursuing their growth objectives without the overhang of the merger saga.
This settlement marks a pivotal moment for Zee, allowing the company to move forward and concentrate on future opportunities without the shadow of ongoing legal battles.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand