Express Scripts Files Lawsuit Against FTC, Claims Drug Pricing Report Misleading
Pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) Express Scripts has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), challenging the agency’s recent report on drug pricing. According to Reuters, the company claims the report defames PBMs by concluding that they contribute to rising drug costs.
Express Scripts, owned by Cigna, filed the lawsuit on Tuesday in a federal court in St. Louis, Missouri, seeking a court order to remove the report from public circulation. The company also requests that FTC Chair Lina Khan be recused from any further actions related to the company.
The FTC’s report, published in July, argued that market consolidation within the PBM sector has created conflicts of interest. The regulator pointed to PBMs steering patients toward their own affiliated businesses, which harms independent pharmacies’ ability to compete. “The FTC stands by our study,” said FTC spokesperson Douglas Farrar, per Reuters. Farrar also highlighted that three major companies, including UnitedHealth Group’s Optum, CVS Health’s CVS Caremark and Express Scripts, control nearly 80% of the PBM market.
Related: Generics and Biosimilars: The Missing Piece in US Drug Price Negotiations
Express Scripts has strongly pushed back against the report, asserting that the FTC ignored significant evidence the PBMs provided and instead relied heavily on public comments. In its lawsuit, the company contends the report has sparked lawsuits and investigations from both state regulators and federal lawmakers.
Express Scripts also criticized the FTC’s approach, stating that the agency should be a neutral advocate for consumers and fair competition rather than being influenced by political interests. “The Commission was intended to be a bipartisan defender of consumers and fair competition, not an ideological pawn driven by political winds and special interests,” the company said in its filing.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand