The Canadian Competition Bureau has indicated that businesses should prepare for a new era of stringent enforcement following significant amendments to the Competition Act. Matthew Boswell, the Commissioner of the Competition Bureau, emphasized the increased power of the watchdog, stating, “Today, we have a law that is significantly stronger, one that finally addresses many of the longstanding inadequacies of the Competition Act.” This message was delivered during a speech at the Canadian Bar Association Competition Fall Law Conference, as reported by the Financial Post.
The Competition Act has undergone three rounds of amendments in just three years, with the latest changes implemented by Parliament in June. These modifications bolster the Bureau’s authority, particularly in addressing deceptive marketing practices. The new provisions target misleading discount claims, unsupported environmental assertions, and “drip pricing,” where additional fees are tacked onto the initial price of products.
This shift in enforcement has already manifested in a recent decision by the Competition Tribunal, which imposed a $38.9 million fine on Cineplex Inc. for concealing a hidden booking fee of $1.50 for online ticket purchases. According to the Financial Post, Boswell remarked, “The decision sends a strong message that businesses should not engage in drip pricing and need to display their full prices upfront whenever additional fees are mandatory for consumers.” He warned that companies failing to adhere to the law could face substantial financial penalties.
The latest updates to the Competition Act not only heighten penalties but also enhance the Bureau’s merger control capabilities. Boswell clarified that while these changes may not significantly impact most mergers, they will empower the Bureau to address cases with serious competition concerns, particularly in concentrated sectors.
As corporate Canada braces for these changes, businesses are advised to ensure compliance with the revamped regulations to avoid hefty fines and scrutiny from the Competition Bureau.
Source: The Financial Post
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand