Wizz Air’s challenge against a capital increase for its Romanian competitor TAROM was rejected by the General Court of the European Union. The decision upheld the European Commission’s approval of state aid provided by Romania to support TAROM during the COVID-19 pandemic, as reported by Reuters.
Wizz Air had taken the case to the Luxembourg-based court after the European Commission sanctioned a €2 million ($2.15 million) financial aid package for TAROM, aiming to mitigate the financial consequences of travel restrictions imposed during the pandemic. The European Commission had previously determined that the assistance complied with EU state aid regulations, choosing not to launch a formal investigation into the matter.
The General Court ruled that the aid granted to TAROM was “compatible with the internal market,” agreeing with the Commission’s assessment that the financial support was proportionate to the challenges faced by the airline. In its ruling, the court affirmed that the Commission had appropriately evaluated the impact of the aid package on competition within the European airline industry.
Wizz Air, however, still has the option to escalate the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Union, which could examine the case on legal grounds. The ruling highlights ongoing tensions within the airline industry, as several European carriers, including Wizz Air and Ryanair, have filed lawsuits in response to the large-scale state aid packages provided to airlines during the pandemic.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand