Vanderbilt University quarterback Diego Pavia has filed a lawsuit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), arguing that its eligibility rules for junior college athletes are restrictive and anticompetitive. Filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Pavia’s suit challenges specific NCAA bylaws he claims unfairly limit junior college athletes’ ability to compete and earn in NCAA Division I sports after transferring, according to Bloomberg.
At the center of Pavia’s case is the NCAA’s “five-year rule,” a bylaw providing collegiate athletes with a five-year period to complete four seasons of play. This rule, also called an “eligibility clock,” starts ticking from the moment a student-athlete enrolls full-time at any collegiate institution—NCAA-affiliated or not. Pavia argues that this structure is problematic for junior college athletes, whose eligibility clock begins at their junior college, leaving them with fewer seasons to play if they transfer to an NCAA school after two years.
Per the lawsuit, Pavia contends the NCAA’s approach to eligibility does not support the academic progression of junior college athletes, as intended. Instead, he asserts, starting an athlete’s eligibility clock at a two-year institution does not align with helping them reach academic or athletic goals once they join an NCAA institution. He advocates for adjustments to the bylaw, proposing that the eligibility clock should only start when an athlete enrolls at an NCAA institution.
Read more: Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
In addition to eligibility concerns, Pavia’s suit highlights barriers to junior college athletes’ potential income from name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals. Since the Supreme Court’s 2021 ruling allowing college athletes to receive compensation for NIL, multiple lawsuits have scrutinized NCAA policies that plaintiffs claim restrict financial opportunities for athletes. According to Bloomberg, Pavia’s case joins a growing wave of litigation addressing college athletes’ economic rights.
This legal action follows recent developments involving NCAA athlete compensation. Last month, a federal judge granted preliminary approval for a $2.8 billion settlement in an antitrust case involving the NCAA. However, the settlement remains contentious, as some advocate for adjustments to ensure equitable pay across genders, Bloomberg reports.
Pavia, who previously played at a junior college before joining New Mexico State and later transferring to Vanderbilt, suggests changes that would redefine intercollegiate competition within NCAA bylaws. Under his proposal, eligibility would be based on enrollment at an NCAA member institution rather than any collegiate institution, which could give junior college athletes a fairer chance at completing a full four-season collegiate career.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand