DOJ and States File Suit to Block UnitedHealth’s $3.3B Acquisition of Amedisys
The U.S. Justice Department, along with the attorneys general of Maryland, New Jersey, and New York, filed a lawsuit on Tuesday aimed at blocking UnitedHealth Group’s $3.3 billion acquisition of Amedisys. According to Reuters, the government officials raised concerns that the merger could reduce competition in the home health services market, which would ultimately harm both patients and service providers.
In a statement, the Justice Department explained that eliminating competition between UnitedHealth and Amedisys would “harm patients who receive home health and hospice services, insurers who contract for home health services, and nurses who provide home health and hospice services.” The lawsuit reflects a broader concern about the potential consolidation of power within the home healthcare industry, which could limit consumer choice and raise costs for insurers.
Reuters reports that neither UnitedHealth nor Amedisys immediately responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit. Following the announcement, shares of UnitedHealth fell 1.5%, while Amedisys’ stock dropped 1.3% to $91.50, now over 9% lower than UnitedHealth’s $101-per-share offer.
Related: UnitedHealth and Amedisys Prepare for Key Antitrust Meeting with DOJ
The proposed acquisition, first announced last year, had already raised concerns about regulatory scrutiny due to UnitedHealth’s significant presence in the home health sector. Analysts had anticipated that the Justice Department would closely examine the deal, and a recent meeting between executives from both companies and the department’s officials only heightened these expectations, as reported by Bloomberg News.
To address antitrust concerns, Amedisys proposed selling over 100 of its locations to a private operator in Texas if the deal is approved, according to Reuters. However, Stephens analyst Scott Fidel expressed doubts about whether this would be enough to overcome the concerns of the Biden administration’s tough stance on antitrust issues. “These remedies do not seem sufficient to satisfy the hardline Biden DOJ,” he said. “Clearly, we’ll look to see whether a Trump DOJ decides to pursue or drop this case in 2025.”
This legal challenge is not the first time the Justice Department has taken aim at a major healthcare deal. In 2022, the department sued to block UnitedHealth’s acquisition of Change Healthcare, though the transaction ultimately went through later that year. According to Reuters, the outcome of the current case will likely influence future regulatory decisions regarding mergers in the healthcare sector.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand