Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti and twenty-two other Republican state attorneys general voiced concerns that the Net Zero Financial Services Provider Alliance’s commitment to reach global net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner could violate state and federal antitrust laws.
In a letter to members of the Alliance, the AGs warned that the commitment could “artificially restrict the supply of goods and services and inhibit innovation,” and pose potential violations of antitrust and consumer protection laws. The AGs also cautioned that the signatories may be misleading consumers about the viability of the “activist climate agenda” and violating expectations of objective and independent financial services.
The Alliance includes accounting’s Big Four — Deloitte, Ernst & Young, PricewaterhouseCoopers and KPMG. It’s aim is to align the business practices of it’s members with the Paris Climate Agreement’s goal of limiting the global temperature rise to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
“Decisions about energy policy should be made by our elected representatives, not by transnational corporate alliances,” said Skrmetti in the letter.
Related: 22 Attorney Generals Issue Antitrust Warning Over ESG Initiatives
The AGs also voiced concerns that the Alliance could wield enough combined market power to potentially pressure other companies to comply with it’s policy preferences. As such, the group of AGs have issued 11 requests of information on communications between Alliance members, as well as the reasons for joining the group and any conversations surrounding interim targets in line with the pledge.
This inquiry follows an investigation by fourteen Republican state attorneys general launched in the fall of last year, looking into the climate pledges made by the banks of the Alliance regarding allegations that credit to oil companies is being blocked.
Governors in 19 states also pledged earlier this year to utilize state pensions to influence financial services providers to limit the use of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing in pension fund investment management.
Source: CFO Dive
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh