Amazon has denied allegations of deceptive practices in relation to its Amazon Prime subscription service, urging U.S. District Judge John Chun in Seattle to dismiss the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) lawsuit. Amazon’s legal team argues that the case “fails in its entirety” per Reuters.
The FTC filed a lawsuit against Amazon in June, accusing the e-commerce giant of misleading consumers into enrolling in Prime and making it challenging for them to cancel their subscriptions. Amazon countered this by stating that it had “prominently and repeatedly” disclosed crucial terms, such as pricing and automatic renewal, to its Prime customers.
Amazon further accused the FTC of attempting to penalize the company through vague concepts, such as “manipulative” website designs, asserting that the standards proposed by the FTC are constitutionally unclear.
Read more: What’s Going On Between The FTC And Amazon?
“In a case supposedly about clarity, the FTC’s purported standards are unconstitutionally opaque,” Amazon stated. A company spokesperson emphasized that Prime’s sign-up and cancellation processes are intentionally designed to be “clear and simple” and have consistently met standards exceeding legal requirements.
The lawsuit is part of the Biden administration’s broader regulatory and enforcement actions against major technology firms.
In a separate case, the FTC, in September, accused Amazon of violating U.S. antitrust laws by imposing business practices that restrict merchants from offering lower prices than those on Amazon’s platform. This case is also pending in Judge Chun’s Seattle court.
The FTC’s lawsuit regarding Amazon Prime alleges that the company, “under substantial pressure” from the FTC, modified its cancellation process in April, just before the agency filed its lawsuit. The complaint highlights that “Amazon still requires five clicks on desktop and six on mobile for consumers to cancel from Amazon.com.”
A 10-day non-jury trial for this case is scheduled for February 2025.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand