A Seattle federal court has given the green light for a prospective consumer class action against Amazon, alleging the online retail giant’s involvement in a price-fixing scheme that artificially inflates prices for various products on its platform. In a recent development, US District Judge John Chun issued a 24-page order, permitting the lawsuit’s advancement, as it challenges Amazon’s pricing policies, which the consumer plaintiffs argue violate antitrust laws.
The plaintiffs, comprising five individuals residing in California and Maryland who are regular Amazon shoppers, claim that Amazon’s actions run counter to the fundamental principles of antitrust regulations. This ruling now allows the plaintiffs to proceed with their claims, while Amazon retains the opportunity to defend itself against any allegations of wrongdoing in subsequent stages of the litigation.
As of now, Amazon has not provided any immediate comment on the court’s decision, and the legal team representing the company in this matter has yet to respond to requests for statements.
Related: Amazon Must Face Consumer Antitrust Lawsuit
Steve Berman, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, expressed their satisfaction with the court’s order, stating that they are “thrilled” and eagerly anticipate the opportunity to pursue the case further.
This lawsuit is just one of several legal actions, both private and state-based, that have accused Amazon of engaging in business practices that potentially contravene consumer protection laws or antitrust regulations. Additionally, the ruling coincides with ongoing deliberations by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding a potential lawsuit against Amazon.
The consumer lawsuit, initially filed in July 2022, centers on Amazon’s “minimum margin agreements” with its merchandise suppliers. The plaintiffs contend that these agreements effectively restrict non-Amazon retailers from selling the same products at lower prices elsewhere, contributing to the alleged price-fixing scheme.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand