Tech giant Amazon.com is currently seeking to have a lawsuit dismissed that accuses its cloud-computing division, Amazon Web Services (AWS), of engaging in anti-competitive practices. The lawsuit was filed by Subspace Omega, a Wyoming-based startup specializing in web traffic optimization, which ceased operations in 2022.
According to a report by Reuters, Subspace alleges that AWS wrongly terminated a peering agreement—a partnership that allowed both companies to share network resources—thereby infringing on antitrust laws. This termination, Subspace claims, was a deliberate move by Amazon to eliminate competition and consolidate its dominance in the cloud networking market.
Subspace’s lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Seattle, is seeking $417 million in damages. The company argues that AWS’s actions have not only forced it out of business but have also restricted market competition, thereby harming innovation. “Amazon has a vested interest in forcing innovators out of business and limiting the free market to create an illegal moat around AWS’s monopoly profits,” Subspace’s attorneys stated, as reported by Reuters.
Read more: Amazon Denies Monopolistic Threat in Mexico Amid Regulatory Scrutiny
The crux of Subspace’s complaint centers on Amazon’s refusal to continue the peering arrangement, which Subspace views as an abuse of Amazon’s market power. This move by Amazon reportedly led to Subspace losing its largest client, Epic Games, the creator of the popular online game Fortnite. Subspace claims it was unable to fulfill its contract with Epic Games following the termination of the peering agreement with AWS.
In response, Amazon has argued that the lawsuit lacks merit, emphasizing that business negotiations are commonplace and that not achieving desired terms in a deal does not constitute an antitrust violation. “If not receiving the terms you want in a business deal were an antitrust violation, courts would be flooded with contrived antitrust claims,” Amazon stated in its filing.
This legal battle comes at a time when Amazon is facing several other antitrust lawsuits from both consumers and government agencies, including the Federal Trade Commission, highlight their concerns over Amazon’s market practices and its impact on competition.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand