Two separate reports claim that Amazon has settled its two EU antitrust cases and agreed to behavioral changes that will prevent future abuses. The settlement will be announced on December 20.
The settlement will require Amazon to give rival sellers of products equal access to its dominant online storefront as its own, Amazon-branded products. It will prevent Amazon from using the private data it acquires about third-party sellers to decide which products to copy and sell under the Amazon brand. And it lets independent sellers participate in Amazon’s Prime program without being forced to use Amazon’s logistics business. (That latter change has echoes of the in-app purchase probes that both Apple and Google face.)
Amazon will not pay a financial penalty, but it avoids several years of litigation, billions of dollars in legal costs, and annual fines of up to 10 percent of its global revenues.
Related: NGOs Say EU Amazon Antitrust Probe Has Many Issues
The New York Times, which is one of the high-profile sources for this information, notes that the Amazon settlement could serve as a preview of similar upcoming changes at Apple, Google, and Meta, each of which faces various EU investigations of their own. The publication cites three people with knowledge of the deal.
News of the settlement was first reported by the Financial Times, which said that the final deal closely follows the language of a draft proposal from this past summer.
According to the reports, the agreement covers only the EU, of course, though Amazon could proactively choose to avoid antitrust entanglements in the US and elsewhere by adopting it globally; California, for example, has already sued Amazon for the same reasons. The EU agreement will be in effect for five years.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand