On Tuesday Verax Biomedical sued the US Red Cross over claims that it has worsened a “national blood crisis” by destroying a robust industry filled with low-cost middlemen, reported Bloomberg Law.
This new antitrust suit is challenging the Red Cross’ new policy of pre-treating all platelets it sells to hospitals rather than letting them choose among various rival organizations.
According to the complaint, the move to tie “platelet bacteria mitigation” services to a blood banking sector dominated by the Red Cross is effectively coercing hospitals into exclusive dealing arrangements—given that many have no other platelet options—and forcing companies like Verax out of business. Verax allegedly makes a popular platelet screening test.
Read More: South Korea: Two firms fined for price fixing Red Cross’ blood bags
The suit comes as blood banking groups like the Red Cross, which allegedly holds a 50% market share, are seeking to recover from blood shortages post COVID-19, Bloomberg reported.
According to the complaint “the organization’s decision “to weaponize its dominant position in the US platelet market” is also exacerbating shortages, increasing prices and waste while reducing consumer choice and innovation. These harms are ongoing and cannot be dismantled by natural market forces.”
A Red Cross spokesperson, in a statement to Bloomberg Law, said Wednesday that the case is a baseless challenge to its “platelet safety strategy.”
“The Red Cross mitigates bacterial risk in platelets and complies with FDA guidance primarily by using pathogen inactivation, a solution that reduces bacterial risk while also mitigating other pathogen threats and safety risks,” the statement said. “We believe pathogen inactivation is critical to maintaining a safe and readily available platelet supply for patients in need.”
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand