On Monday, the Antitrust Authority announced a fine of over €4.03 million imposed on the Italian Soccer Federation (FIGC) for the abuse of its dominant market position. This penalty was issued due to the federation’s exclusion of other organizations involved in the promotion of sports from organizing amateur youth football competitions.
In response to the antitrust ruling, the Italian Soccer Federation expressed its intention to appeal the decision to the Lazio Regional Administrative Court. The federation released a statement declaring the penalty as unjustified, unsupported by the facts of the case and the precedent of the law.
“The FIGC considers the penalty to be unjustified, based on erroneous documented arguments and legal reasoning,” the statement read. The federation further compared its situation to that of the equestrian sports federation, which faced similar sanctions in previous proceedings. Those sanctions were subsequently annulled by the Council of State, an administrative court.
This development highlights ongoing tensions between major sports federations such as the Italian Soccer Federation and regulatory authorities over market practices and antitrust laws.
For example, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from FIFA and the United States Soccer Federation, effectively allowing a lawsuit to proceed that challenges the organizations’ control over professional soccer matches in the United States. The lawsuit, initiated by Relevent Sports Group, a soccer promotion company owned by billionaire Stephen Ross, accuses the soccer governing bodies of violating antitrust laws by blocking foreign teams from playing official matches on U.S. soil.
Related: US Soccer’s Monopoly Challenged: Supreme Court Agrees
Source: ANSA
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand