Antitrust Battle: Arizona and Wisconsin MLSs Seek Dismissal of Lawsuit by Zillow
In a legal skirmish echoing through the real estate industry, the Arizona Regional MLS (ARMLS) and Wisconsin-based Metro MLS are aiming to quash an antitrust lawsuit brought against them by Zillow Group and ShowingTime.
Initiated in late December 2023, the lawsuit alleges that ARMLS, Metro MLS, and MLS Aligned, the parent company of showing platform Aligned Showings, are engaged in anti-competitive behavior by seeking to monopolize the real estate showing management services market within their respective territories. The complaint further contends that the defendants conspired to exclude or severely limit ShowingTime, a direct competitor in those markets.
Central to the dispute is the allegation that the MLS defendants decided to exclusively offer Aligned Showings to their members, thereby sidelining ShowingTime, which had been a longstanding option. MLS Aligned, described as a joint venture among the defendants and other undisclosed MLSs, has come under scrutiny for its role in this arrangement.
In response to the lawsuit, the MLS defendants filed a motion on Tuesday seeking to dismiss the case with prejudice. In their filing, they assert that the allegations should be viewed with skepticism from the outset. The motion argues that Zillow and ShowingTime’s primary concern is not genuine competition but rather the challenge posed to ShowingTime’s market dominance in select regions.
Read more: Judge Rules Zillow CEO Can Be Deposed In Antitrust Case
According to the defendants, the complaint misinterprets antitrust law by portraying competition as a threat rather than a fundamental aspect of the American capitalist system. They contend that the plaintiffs’ perspective fails to acknowledge the benefits of competition and the consumer choice it fosters.
The outcome of this legal battle holds significant implications for the real estate industry, particularly in terms of market dynamics and the availability of showing management services. As the proceedings unfold, stakeholders are closely watching to see how the courts will address the complex intersection of competition law and business practices within the MLS landscape.
Both sides remain entrenched in their positions, setting the stage for a protracted legal struggle that could reshape the dynamics of the real estate market in the regions affected by the dispute.
Source: Housing Wire
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh