The AFC wild-card playoff game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Miami Dolphins became the most-streamed event in the United States, drawing an average of 23 million viewers across various platforms, including the NBCUniversal streaming service Peacock, local NBC stations, and NFL+ on mobile devices. Despite the success of this streaming-exclusive broadcast, it has raised concerns about antitrust issues, as some argue that the move may have unfairly restricted access and imposed additional costs on viewers.
The Streaming Milestone:
The unprecedented success of the AFC wild-card playoff game, breaking records with 23 million viewers, marks a significant shift in the way audiences consume live sports content. The inclusion of streaming platforms has become a pivotal aspect of the modern media landscape, offering convenience and accessibility to a diverse audience.
Antitrust Concerns:
However, the celebration of this streaming milestone is accompanied by growing antitrust concerns. The decision to air the game exclusively on Peacock, NBCUniversal’s streaming service, has sparked criticism from some quarters. New York congressman Pat Ryan expressed his outrage over the requirement for viewers to pay for another streaming service to watch a game traditionally available on cable.
Related: NFL’s Exclusive Streaming of Playoff Game Raises Antitrust Concerns
In a scathing letter, Ryan questioned the need for additional profits at the expense of hardworking Americans, pointing out the antitrust exemption granted to the NFL in its broadcast deals. The exemption was originally intended to ensure fair competition and protect consumers, not to enable major broadcasters to restrict access and potentially exploit their market dominance.
Antitrust Exemption and Congressional Oversight:
Congress granted the NFL an antitrust exemption in its broadcast deals, expecting it to be used in the best interest of fans. However, as witnessed with the exclusive streaming deal between NBC and the NFL, concerns are emerging that the antitrust exemption is being exploited to the detriment of consumers.
The $110 million deal between NBC and the NFL to secure the rights to stream the wild card game on Peacock further underscores the financial motivations behind these decisions. Critics argue that such exclusive deals may create barriers to entry for competitors and limit consumer choice, ultimately giving major broadcasters and streaming services too much power.
Source: Finance Yahoo
Featured News
US Judge OKs $110 Million Settlements in Antitrust Case Against Major Real Estate Brokerages
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
50 States and Territories Reach $49.1 Million Settlement in Generic Drug Price-Fixing Case
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
OpenAI Enhances ChatGPT with New Search Feature, Challenging Google’s Dominance
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
First Circuit Hears Arguments on Whether Federal Baseball Antitrust Exemption Shields Puerto Rican League from Legal Claims
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Appeals Court Expresses Doubts Over FCC’s Authority in Net Neutrality Revival
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI