Recent actions by U.S. antitrust regulators have significantly impacted the pace of private-equity firms’ acquisitions in the healthcare sector, a strategy known for mergers among smaller medical businesses to form larger entities. According to the Wall Street Journal, this slowdown is a direct result of intensified scrutiny from the Biden administration, aiming to preserve competition and protect patients from potential negative outcomes such as increased medical costs and diminished care quality.
Data from PitchBook reveals a stark decline in the number of private-equity add-on deals in the U.S. healthcare sector, with only 180 transactions recorded through May 28 this year. This figure represents a mere 23% of the total deals completed in the previous year, indicating a significant downturn in activity. This reduction in healthcare roll-ups is more pronounced than the overall decrease in private-equity investments, which stands at 34% of last year’s total for the same period.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Justice Department have been at the forefront of this regulatory push, launching a formal inquiry on May 23 to investigate the adverse effects of roll-ups across the U.S. economy. Their efforts have included initiating probes into healthcare profiteering, revising merger guidelines to encompass more buyout roll-up deals, and taking legal action against firms accused of attempting to monopolize markets and fix prices through healthcare roll-ups.
Tim Cornell, an antitrust partner at law firm Debevoise & Plimpton, noted that while these regulatory measures have made completing deals more challenging and costly, they have not entirely deterred firms from pursuing them. “I am not sure it has created the uncrossable ravine in the marketplace that the government hopes to create,” he commented, highlighting the ongoing adaptability of private-equity firms in the face of increased scrutiny.
Read more: Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
Historically, roll-ups have been a cornerstone strategy for private-equity firms, with add-on transactions constituting 76% of total U.S. buyouts by the end of 2022. The rationale behind these deals is straightforward: merging several smaller companies into a larger entity can yield higher profit margins through economies of scale and subsequently attract higher valuations in the merger market.
For many years, antitrust regulators paid little attention to roll-ups, focusing instead on larger transactions. However, under the leadership of Lina Khan, who has chaired the FTC since 2021, there has been a paradigm shift. The FTC has grown increasingly concerned about the cumulative impact of these acquisitions, particularly in the healthcare sector, where they can significantly affect competition and consumer welfare, reported the WSJ.
“By consolidating power gradually and incrementally, through a series of smaller deals, firms have sometimes sidestepped antitrust review,” Khan stated in March. She emphasized the potential of these strategies to “eliminate meaningful competition and allow new owners to jack up prices, degrade quality, and neutralize rivals without competitive checks.”
In response to these concerns, antitrust authorities revised merger guidelines in December to facilitate the review of smaller roll-up transactions. Additionally, in March, a federal probe into private-equity conduct in the medical sector was announced, focusing on the implications of roll-ups.
Despite facing increased regulatory hurdles, the private-equity industry and its lobbyists continue to advocate for their buy-and-build strategies, arguing for their efficiency and economic benefits.
Source: WSJ
Featured News
Spain to Lodge Anti-Competitive Complaint Against French Rail Operator Ouigo
Jun 27, 2024 by
CPI
Jury Deliberates NFL’s ‘Sunday Ticket’ Class-Action Lawsuit
Jun 27, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Watchdog Dismisses Allegations of Google Abusing Dominant Position to Favor Truecaller
Jun 27, 2024 by
CPI
Massachusetts Top Court Clears Way for Voter Decision on Gig Driver Classification
Jun 27, 2024 by
CPI
French Pharmaceutical Servier Loses Court Battle Against EU Fine
Jun 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Labor & Antitrust
Jun 24, 2024 by
CPI
A Brief History of Labor Within Antitrust Law
Jun 24, 2024 by
CPI
Balancing Act: Navigating Nuances in Labor Market Enforcement
Jun 24, 2024 by
CPI
Countervailing Powers: Voice vs. Exit in Remedying Labor Market Harms from Anticompetitive Mergers
Jun 24, 2024 by
CPI
Can Personalization in Online Employment Platforms Drive Hiring Bias?
Jun 24, 2024 by
CPI