![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/ANTITRUST-IMPLICATIONS-OF-LABOR-PLATFORM-By-Marshall-Steinbaum-e1632301164355.jpg)
By Marshall Steinbaum
Labor platforms like Uber have mostly escaped antitrust scrutiny, despite the apparent legal risk that, by coordinating pricing among tens of thousands of “independent contractors,” they might run afoul of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. On the other hand, the enforcement agencies have indicated that collective bargaining by those contractors against the platform does trigger liability under Section 1. This piece argues that this disparate antitrust treatment of powerful platforms versus their counterparties plays a significant role in carving out legal space for the labor platforms, in the regulatory black hole that has opened up as both labor and antitrust law have retracted.
Featured News
Bosch’s $8.1 Billion Deal to Buy Johnson Controls, Hitachi HVAC Operations
Jul 23, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Upholds FTC Rule Banning Noncompete Agreements in Antitrust Case
Jul 23, 2024 by
CPI
Thailand and the Philippines Work Together to Boost Competition Regulation
Jul 23, 2024 by
CPI
European Leagues and FIFPRO Europe to File Antitrust Complaint Against FIFA
Jul 23, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Launches Study on Data-Driven Targeted Pricing Practices by Eight Major Companies
Jul 23, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Artificial Intelligence & Antitrust
Jul 24, 2024 by
CPI
On the Antitrust Implications of Embedding Generative AI in Core Platform Services
Jul 24, 2024 by
CPI
Generative AI Partnerships: Separating Good from Bad
Jul 24, 2024 by
CPI
Artificial Intelligence: A New Dimension for Competition?
Jul 24, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Lessons from “I, Robot”
Jul 24, 2024 by
CPI