![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Apple-robots.jpg)
Apple Inc. has requested a federal judge in New Jersey to dismiss a high-profile antitrust lawsuit filed by U.S. federal and state regulators. According to Reuters, the lawsuit accuses Apple of monopolizing the smartphone market through restrictive practices. The company contends that the case represents an attempt to impose a “judicial redesign” of its iPhone technology.
The Justice Department, along with 19 states and Washington, D.C., has alleged that Apple engages in illegal monopolistic behavior by imposing contractual restrictions on developers and limiting their access to crucial technologies. In a motion submitted to the court in Newark, New Jersey, Apple argued that placing “reasonable limitations” on third-party developers does not constitute anti-competitive conduct.
Per Reuters, U.S. District Judge Julien Neals, who is overseeing the case, will review responses from both the government and Apple before making a decision on the motion later this year. Apple’s legal team highlighted in court that the company faces significant competition from global smartphone manufacturers, including Google and Samsung.
Read more: Apple Denies EU Competition Law Violation Ahead of Fine Decision
The filing also challenges the lawsuit’s claim that Apple’s actions have negatively impacted consumers. According to Apple, the complaint fails to demonstrate any substantial harm to consumers, a crucial element in antitrust cases. “It is implausible to claim, as the government does, that Apple has deterred any customers from switching to Google or Samsung due to its policies,” the company stated in its motion.
The lawsuit, filed in March, accuses Apple of obstructing rivals by restricting their access to hardware and software features on its devices. Antitrust enforcers allege that Apple has used its control over app distribution to stifle innovations that could make it easier for consumers to switch phones.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Harris Outlines Plans to Curb Price Gouging and Ban Hidden Fees Ahead of Election
Aug 1, 2024 by
CPI
European Commission Approves $34 Billion Merger Between Bunge and Viterra
Aug 1, 2024 by
CPI
Apple Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Lawsuit in New Jersey Court
Aug 1, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Loses Appeal Over $100 Million Payout to Elliott in Samsung Merger Dispute
Aug 1, 2024 by
CPI
EU Commission Approves HPE’s $14 Billion Acquisition of Juniper Networks
Aug 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Trade & Antitrust
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
What is Wrong with the WTO Discipline on Subsidies?
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
The Abiding Tension Between Trade Remedy Law and Antitrust
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
Trade and Antitrust: An End to Isolationism
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI
International Trade Law and Domestic Regulation of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Divergent Approaches?
Jul 26, 2024 by
CPI