Apple has formally requested to participate in the upcoming antitrust trial targeting Google’s dominance in the online search market, citing concerns over its lucrative revenue-sharing agreements with the tech giant. According to Reuters, these agreements, which make Google the default search engine on Apple’s Safari browser, generate billions of dollars for the iPhone maker each year.
In court documents filed on Monday in Washington, Apple revealed that it does not intend to build its own search engine, regardless of whether the agreements with Google continue. The tech giant’s lawyers noted that Apple received an estimated $20 billion from Google under the arrangement in 2022 alone, per Reuters.
Apple has also expressed an interest in calling witnesses to testify during the trial, scheduled for April. The Department of Justice and state prosecutors are expected to argue that Google’s practices have stifled competition in the online search industry. Measures proposed by prosecutors include breaking up key parts of Google’s business, such as the Chrome browser and the Android operating system.
Read more: Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
“Google can no longer adequately represent Apple’s interests: Google must now defend against a broad effort to break up its business units,” Apple stated in its filings. This highlights the company’s concern about its agreements being caught in the crossfire of the Justice Department’s case against Google.
Google has indicated a willingness to modify some aspects of its default agreements with browser developers, device manufacturers, and wireless carriers. However, the company has not proposed ending its revenue-sharing deals, which are central to its partnerships with companies like Apple.
This high-profile trial is being closely watched, as its outcome could significantly alter the competitive landscape of online search and how users access information.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Biden Blocks Nippon Steel’s $14.9 Billion Bid for US Steel
Jan 3, 2025 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand