Gaming giant Valve Software, developers and operators of the insanely popular Steam digital distribution service, was slammed in federal court yesterday in a case levelled by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, who argued that Valve breached Australian consumer law when it told customers that they were not entitled to digital refunds.
Steam has a pretty massive audience: 2.2 million Australians use the service, and they’ve previously been told by the company at various points that they are not entitled to refunds for digitally downloaded content.
The maximum penalty for deceptive or misleading conduct is $1.1 million for each breach.
Basically, this is the first time software has been described as ‘goods’ in relation to consumer law – so it could have massive implications for other app and software distributors who aren’t keen on giving refunds.
Now it looks like, as ‘goods’, software and other digital products need to come with “statutory guarantees about goods being of acceptable quality”. Depending on how this goes down, this could be a pretty big deal for gamers and general consumers in Australia.
Full content: PC Gamer
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand