Australia’s government has abandoned plans to fine internet platforms up to 5% of their global revenue for failing to curb misinformation online. The proposal, part of a broader regulatory push by the Australian government, was aimed at addressing the rising concern over the spread of harmful content on foreign-owned tech platforms. This decision comes ahead of a federal election, expected within the next year.
According to Reuters, Communications Minister Michelle Rowland stated on Sunday that after reviewing feedback from senators, it had become clear that there was insufficient support to pass the bill through the Senate. “Based on public statements and engagements with Senators, it is clear that there is no pathway to legislate this proposal through the Senate,” Rowland said in a statement.
The bill, which would have held major tech companies accountable for their efforts to combat misinformation, was seen as a potential step towards greater transparency in the industry. Rowland emphasized that the legislation would have introduced an unprecedented level of scrutiny, requiring tech platforms to be more accountable for their systems and processes aimed at reducing the spread of misinformation.
Read more: Trump’s Nominee for Attorney General Could Intensify Big Tech Battles
“Some four-fifths of Australians wanted the spread of misinformation addressed,” Rowland said, referencing public support for stronger action against disinformation. However, despite this backing, the bill faced strong opposition in Parliament. The Liberal-National coalition, along with the Australian Greens and crossbench senators, expressed their disapproval, according to Sky News.
Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young criticized the bill as a “half-baked option” in remarks broadcast on Australian Broadcasting Corp. She argued that the proposed regulations were insufficient to tackle the scale of misinformation issues facing the nation.
The Australian government’s attempt to regulate misinformation is part of a broader global conversation on the power of big tech companies and their role in shaping public discourse. Industry group DIGI, which counts Meta among its members, had previously stated that the proposed legislation merely reinforced existing anti-misinformation codes.
With the government’s failure to push the bill through Parliament, it remains unclear what further steps will be taken to address the spread of harmful content on social media platforms in the coming months.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand