One of the world’s largest worldwide automotive suppliers, Japanese-based Yazaki Corporation, has received the largest fine ever under competition law in Australia for engaging in cartel conduct.
The AUS$46 million (US$34.6 million) penalty, imposed on Wednesday, May 16, by the Federal Court, following an appeal by the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC), more than quadruples the original AUS$9.5 million (US$7.1 million) fine and ends a six year case against the global company, which supplied wire harnesses—electrical cabling—used in the Toyota Camry when it was manufactured in Australia.
The penalty aligns with the ACCC’s original submission for a fine between AUS$42 million (US$31.6 million) and AUS$55 million (US$41.3 million).
The Australian decision follows a US$470 million fine for price-fixing in 2012 following a two-year investigation by the US Justice Department that also saw four Yazaki executives in America receive prison sentences. The company, which has an annual turnover in excess of US$14 billion, received additional state-based penalties in the USA over the illegal behavior.
Full Content: ABC News
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand