New laws in Australia would allow the country’s media watchdog to force Big Tech to turn over data on how they deal with misinformation, bringing yet a new twist to the country’s ongoing efforts to rein in the negative effects of the growing digital economy.
As Reuters reported Monday (March 21), the laws also let the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) enforce an internet industry code on platforms that don’t cooperate, part of a worldwide effort to curb the prevalence of misinformation and disinformation online.
The laws are a response to an investigation by the authority that found that 80% of adults in Australia had encountered COVID misinformation, and 76% want online platforms to do make more of an effort in dealing with false or misleading content.
“Digital platforms must take responsibility for what is on their sites and take action when harmful or misleading content appears,” Communications Minister Paul Fletcher said in a statement.
Read More: Addressing Big Tech’s power over speech.
The ACMA said Australians were most likely to come across misinformation on Twitter and Facebook. The authority added that false narratives usually began with “highly emotive and engaging posts within small online conspiracy groups” and were “amplified by international influencers, local public figures and by coverage in the media.”
In addition, the ACMA said that disinformation – false information that’s intentionally spread to spark discord or influence politics – continues to target people in Australia. Between 2019 and 2020, Facebook removed four disinformation campaigns in the country.
The ACMA said conspiracy groups have urged users to flock to smaller, less-moderated platforms like Telegram. If those platforms reject industry content standards, the authority said, “they may present a higher risk to the Australian community.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand