A PYMNTS Company

Australia’s Push for Stricter Tech Laws Prompts Fiery Response from Elon Musk

 |  September 17, 2024

Elon Musk, CEO of X (formerly known as Twitter), has sparked controversy by denouncing Australia’s proposed legislation aimed at regulating social media platforms, calling the government “fascists” in a recent online post. The proposed laws, which would give Australia’s media regulator greater power to hold tech companies accountable for harmful content, including disinformation and online scams, have triggered a heated debate.

Musk’s comments came in response to a bill introduced this week that could impose fines of up to 5% of a social media platform’s global revenue if they fail to comply with the new regulations. The bill has not yet been passed but is part of Australia’s broader efforts to tighten tech regulation, a move that has placed the country at odds with major global tech firms. According to the Financial Times, the legislation would significantly expand the regulatory powers of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to ensure online safety.

The proposed laws have drawn sharp reactions from Australian politicians. Stephen Jones, Australia’s finance minister, rebuked Musk’s remarks, describing them as “crackpot stuff” and emphasizing that the regulation is about protecting the nation’s sovereignty. Bill Shorten, former leader of the Labor Party and a senior cabinet minister, was even more scathing. “Elon Musk’s had more positions on free speech than the Kama Sutra,” Shorten told Australian radio, accusing the billionaire of using free speech rhetoric only when it aligns with his business interests.

Related: Brazil Suspends Elon Musk’s Social Network X Amid Ongoing Legal Dispute

This is not the first time Musk has clashed with Australian authorities over technology regulation. In May, he criticized the country’s eSafety Commissioner for “censorship” after the agency took X to court, seeking to force the removal of graphic content linked to a stabbing incident in Sydney. While the court ultimately ruled in favor of X, Musk’s outbursts underscore a growing tension between the social media mogul and governments globally over the regulation of online platforms.

According to Financial Times, Australia has been leading global efforts to regulate big tech, introducing a range of measures aimed at curbing the power of social media giants. This includes recent moves to enforce a minimum age for social media users to combat screen addiction among young people. The government is also expected to implement a suite of new laws aimed at regulating how personal data is used by artificial intelligence, reflecting its commitment to stricter tech governance.

In a further sign of Australia’s resolve, the government introduced new data privacy laws this week targeting “doxxing”—the practice of publicly sharing private information online without consent. Those found guilty could face up to seven years in jail, signaling the severity with which the country is tackling online harassment. These data privacy measures, along with the broader regulatory push, have been described by experts as giving Australia’s tech regulation “more teeth,” according to Monique Azzopardi, a lawyer at Clayton Utz, as cited by the Financial Times.

Australia’s efforts to regulate the tech industry are also being closely watched on the global stage. Earlier this year, the government threatened to take action against Meta after the tech giant indicated it might withdraw from a pioneering deal that requires platforms to compensate news outlets for linking to their stories.

Source: Financial Times

Zuckerberg Pushes for Settlement Ahead of Antitrust Trial Zuckerberg Pushes for Settlement Ahead of Antitrust Trial

Zuckerberg Pushes for Settlement Ahead of Antitrust Trial

 |  April 2, 2025

Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg is actively lobbying U.S. President Donald Trump and White House officials in an effort to reach a settlement that would prevent the company from facing an upcoming antitrust trial, according to the Wall Street Journal. The trial, scheduled for April 14, could have significant consequences for Meta, including the potential forced divestiture of its acquisitions, WhatsApp and Instagram.

Per the Wall Street Journal, Meta representatives have met with Trump and his senior advisers in recent weeks to discuss the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit, which accuses the company of engaging in anticompetitive practices. Zuckerberg himself visited the White House on Wednesday, marking his third visit during Trump’s presidency. However, the Wall Street Journal notes that some White House aides have grown frustrated with Meta’s lobbying approach, viewing it as overly aggressive.

Meta spokesperson Andy Stone commented on the company’s engagement with policymakers, stating, “We regularly meet with policymakers to discuss issues impacting competitiveness, national security, and economic growth.” Meanwhile, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt declined to provide a comment, and an FTC representative did not immediately respond to inquiries.

The FTC’s lawsuit argues that Facebook, now Meta, has maintained its dominance in the social networking space through a long-term strategy of eliminating competitive threats. According to the complaint, the company has engaged in anticompetitive conduct to sustain its monopoly power. While the FTC is an independent agency, Trump has sought to increase executive oversight over such entities, requiring them to submit significant regulations for White House review.

Related: FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify

A person familiar with Trump’s thinking told the Wall Street Journal that the president has not yet made a decision on whether the administration will seek a settlement with Meta. Former FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, who served under both the Bush and Obama administrations, commented on the unusual nature of a company approaching the White House regarding an antitrust case. “It is unusual for companies involved in big antitrust lawsuits to go to the White House, but it has happened before,” Leibowitz said. However, he added that he has never seen a White House attempt to influence the FTC’s decision-making process, emphasizing the agency’s independence in such matters.

Zuckerberg’s efforts to engage with Trump follow a history of mixed relations between the two. According to the Wall Street Journal, Meta contributed $1 million to Trump’s inaugural fund and Zuckerberg made visits to Mar-a-Lago during the presidential transition. Additionally, in January, Meta settled a lawsuit Trump had filed against the company over its suspension of his social media accounts following the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The settlement resulted in a $25 million payment, with $22 million allocated to Trump’s presidential library fund.

As the April 14 trial approaches, it remains to be seen whether Meta’s lobbying efforts will yield a favorable resolution.

Source: The Wall Street Journal