Australia’s Woodside Energy & Santos In $52B Merger Talks to Form Global Oil Powerhouse
In a joint announcement on Thursday, Australia’s Woodside Energy and Santos revealed that they are engaged in preliminary discussions to create an A$80 billion ($52 billion) global oil and gas giant. The potential merger represents a significant move amid the ongoing trend of consolidation within the international energy sector.
If successful, this consolidation would mark the largest corporate deal in Australia in several years, breaking the subdued trend in buyout activity influenced by rising interest rates and financial market volatility.
Both Woodside and Santos, as major players in Australia’s oil and gas industry, are grappling with increasing pressures related to decarbonization and confronting challenges in their existing projects. Woodside, headquartered in Perth and the larger of the two entities, emphasized that the discussions with Santos are confidential and incomplete, highlighting the absence of certainty regarding the materialization of a deal.
Woodside stated to the Australian stock exchange, “Woodside continuously assesses a range of opportunities to create and deliver value for shareholders.”
The potential merger is expected to face rigorous scrutiny from Australia’s competition regulator, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). The ACCC, having adopted a stricter stance on takeovers within concentrated sectors, acknowledged being aware of the public reports surrounding the potential transaction.
A spokesperson for the ACCC commented, “If the potential transaction progresses, the ACCC would consider if a public merger review into the impact on competition is required.” This underlines the regulatory vigilance in assessing the impact of such a significant merger on market dynamics.
As the energy landscape continues to evolve, the outcome of these discussions will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for both companies involved and the broader Australian energy sector. Investors, industry experts, and regulatory authorities will be closely monitoring the progress of these talks as they unfold in the coming weeks.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh