The Bahamas’ Securities Commission seized $3.5 billion from FTX just after the company’s bankruptcy.
The regulator announced the seizure Thursday (Dec. 29), saying the cryptocurrency funds were moved from FTX Digital Markets (FTXDM) — the company’s subsidiary in the Bahamas — and transferred to the commission’s digital wallets.
“The Commission has consistently taken necessary steps to protect FTXDM customers and creditors as well as the public interest when discharging its duties duly backed by a solid regulatory regime within The Bahamas and international treaties, as well as sound regulatory practices and policies that promote consumer confidence and protections,” the agency said in a news release.
According to the commission, the transfer happened on Nov. 12, one day after FTX filed for bankruptcy protection in U.S. federal court.
Read more: US Bankruptcy Attorney For FTX Spars With Bahamas
The commission said it decided to move the funds after hearing from FTX founder and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried about cyberattacks on FTXDM.
Based on that conversation, “the Commission determined that there was a significant risk of imminent dissipation as to the digital assets under the custody or control of FTXDM to the prejudice of its customers and creditors,” the release said.
The commission said it is holding the funds until it receives direction from the Bahamas’ Supreme Court to transfer them to customers and creditors, or to bankruptcy liquidators.
FTX declared bankruptcy last month following a fast-moving collapse that saw a run on its assets. The fallout led to a series of regulatory investigations, which culminated earlier this month in Bankman-Fried’s arrest on charges of fraud and conspiracy.
This week also saw the filing of a class action suit against FTX and its former executives, aiming to represent 1 million FTX customers who want a judge to rule that FTX customers own the digital assets held by FTX and sister firm Alameda Research.
And if a court decides that the assets are FTX property, then the suit is seeking a ruling that the customers should be compensated ahead of other creditors.
“Customer class members should not have to stand in line along with secured or general unsecured creditors in these bankruptcy proceedings just to share in the diminished estate assets of the FTX Group and Alameda,” the complaint said.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand