Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal troubles have deepened yet again with allegations of a Chinese bribery scheme.
An indictment unsealed by federal prosecutors Tuesday (March 28) accuses the former cryptocurrency wunderkind of greenlighting bribes of more than $40 million for Chinese government officials to regain access to frozen accounts in 2021.
It is the third such indictment against the FTX founder, accused of masterminding a multibillion-dollar fraud that continues to rock the crypto sector.
According to the latest indictment, the frozen accounts held more than $1 billion in cryptocurrency tied to Alameda Research, Bankman-Fried’s investment firm. The accounts were frozen, prosecutors said, as part of an investigation by the Chinese government into a “particular Alameda trading counterparty.”
Read more: Bankman-Fried Reportedly Close To Bail Agreement With Feds
After several attempts to unfreeze the accounts through other means — including hiring lawyers to lobby Beijing and setting up “fraudulent accounts” to transfer the frozen funds — Bankman-Fried authorized a $40 million bribe, the indictment said.
Once that bribe was paid, the Alameda accounts were unfrozen, prosecutors said, and Bankman-Fried directed the transfer of tens of millions of dollars in additional cryptocurrency. The alleged actions were in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, prosecutors allege.
Bankman-Fried, 31, has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him and remains free on bail. He was first arrested last December, weeks after the collapse of FTX, and charged with multiple counts of fraud and conspiracy.
An unsealed indictment last month revealed a number of new charges against Bankman-Fried, including bank fraud, operating an unlicensed money transmitting business and violations of campaign finance laws.
His bail, however, remains an open question, as defense attorneys and prosecutors have been battling over the conditions of that bail.
Last week saw reports that the two sides were close to a new bail agreement, hammered out after prosecutors accused Bankman-Fried of witness tampering by attempting to get in touch with FTX’s general counsel.
Defense lawyers deny that claim, but Judge Lewis Kaplan has threatened to revoke Bankman-Fried’s bail if he doesn’t comply with restrictions on electronic communications.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand