President Joe Biden has called for an investigation into the collapse of Silicon Valley and Signature banks.
“There are important questions of how these banks got into the circumstances in the first place,” the president said during a brief speech Monday, March 13. “We must get the full accounting of what happened and why those responsible can be held accountable.”
Biden’s comments came hours after the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) announced it had established a “bridge bank” to cover the deposits of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) customers and followed a weekend in which federal regulators scrambled to deal with the fallout of SVB and Signature’s twin implosions.
Silicon Valley Bank, once among the 20 largest banks in the country, was taken over and shut down by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation last week after concerns about its liquidity and solvency following a run on deposits.
Read more: Biden’s Former Antitrust Guru Issues A Warning
The state regulator turned over operations to the FDIC, leading to a weekend in which federal officials worked to find a buyer for the bank while also coming up with a plan to protect depositors. While that was happening, Signature Bank — a New York-based lender which had been trying to distance itself from the crypto industry — was also shuttered by regulators.
To prevent further failures, Biden said he would call on Congress and regulators to strengthen banking rules, which the president said were rolled back during the Trump administration.
Meanwhile, former President Trump deflected blame back to Biden, saying on his Truth Social platform that the bank failures were essentially the harbingers of a second Great Depression.
Biden aimed to reassure Americans Monday, saying they “can rest assured our banking system is safe. Your deposits are safe.”
He also stressed that the FDIC’s rescue plan for depositors does not use taxpayer money but rather the fees banks pay into the federal insurance fund. Investors, however, will not be protected, Biden added.
“They knowingly took a risk and when the risk didn’t pay off, investors lose their money, that’s how capitalism works,” he said.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand