Brazil’s Supreme Court has delayed its decision on whether to lift the suspension of social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, as confusion surrounds the payment of pending fines. According to Reuters, the court announced on Friday that X’s legal team had not transferred the fines to the appropriate bank, pushing back any decision on whether the platform can resume operations in one of its largest markets.
The social media platform, owned by billionaire Elon Musk, has been banned in Brazil since late August for failing to comply with court orders on moderating hate speech and neglecting to appoint a legal representative in the country, a requirement under Brazilian law. Despite these setbacks, X’s legal team has been attempting to restore the service, maintaining that the company had followed court orders, including the payment of the fines.
Per Reuters, X’s lawyers have argued that they paid the fines correctly, but the court maintained that the payment had not been made to the correct account. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes responded by instructing that the fines, which total 28.6 million reais (roughly $5.24 million), be transferred to the appropriate bank account before further action can be taken. This fine payment is the last unresolved issue preventing X from being allowed to operate in Brazil once again.
Related: Brazil Suspends Elon Musk’s Social Network X Amid Ongoing Legal Dispute
Earlier on Friday, X filed a formal request to have its services reinstated, claiming that all outstanding fines had been paid. However, Moraes reiterated that the transfer had not been properly completed and that until this issue is resolved, Brazil’s prosecutor general would need to weigh in on the matter before the court could make a final decision.
X’s legal representatives, in response to Moraes’ ruling, contested the need for the prosecutor general’s input, insisting the fines were paid correctly and arguing that this step was unnecessary for the platform to return to service. The platform had already followed several court directives in recent weeks, including blocking accounts under investigation for hate speech.
Despite these efforts, Moraes ruled in late September that X still needed to pay the fines before the suspension could be lifted. According to Reuters, the platform’s lawyers claimed on Friday that the company had paid the full amount but maintained that the disagreement over the transfer details has led to the ongoing delay.
The ban in Brazil has significant implications for X, as the country is one of the platform’s most significant international markets. The tech firm’s future in Brazil now hinges on the resolution of the fine payment issue and the court’s final decision regarding the prosecutor general’s involvement.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Veteran Lawyers Launch Boutique Antitrust Firm in NY and DC
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU’s Top Court Upholds Antitrust Veto on Thyssenkrupp-Tata Steel Deal
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil’s Court Delays X’s Return Over Fine Payment Dispute
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Tencent and Guillemot Family Consider Potential Buyout of Ubisoft
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Second Price-Fixing Case Against Hotel-Casinos Dismissed by Federal Judge
Oct 6, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh