The European Union has stated that Illumina is using tactics to delay the ruling on whether or not they should divest cancer test developer Grail, per the Financial Times.
Illumina has stated that it is making efforts to resolve the litigation related to its acquisition of Grail, which has been the subject of a proxy battle led by activist investor Carl Icahn.
If there is a delay, investors may have to wait several months to receive an outcome regarding the future of Grail. In April, US antitrust regulators mandated that Grail must be divested, a decision that Illumina is currently appealing.
Read more: Illumina Granted Fast-Track Appeal Of FTC Order
The EU antitrust authorities halted the transaction in September due to potential competition concerns. The company had executed the deal without obtaining regulatory approval.
Illumina appealed and opposed an expedited final ruling from Brussels regarding the removal of Grail, according to sources familiar with the situation.
The fast-track procedure in Luxembourg permits judges to promptly settle legal disputes deemed urgent.
“Illumina doesn’t want a fast process in court, they are playing delay tactics,” alleged a person with direct knowledge of the EU’s position.
“The way Illumina is behaving contradicts its claim that it wants to solve the issue fast,” the person added.
According to a source familiar with the company’s strategy, any potential delay in legal proceedings could provide an opportunity to sell Grail at a higher market value while the company exercises its legal rights to defend itself.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand